California Governor’s Podcast Strategy Raises Eyebrows Ahead of 2028 Run

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California Governor Gavin Newsom is facing scrutiny as he attempts to reposition himself for a potential presidential run in 2028. His choice of guests on his new podcast, “This Is Gavin Newsom,” has left many baffled, particularly as it features several prominent right-wing figures.

Newsom, typically viewed as a progressive figure from a solidly blue state, seems to be courting a more centrist audience by inviting guests like Michael Savage, Charlie Kirk, and Steve Bannon. This approach has sparked criticism, as many see it as an odd strategy for someone with Newsom’s political background.

Analysts have noted that such associations may not be well-received by voters who currently view Newsom as part of the elite coastal establishment, which has often been a target for conservative criticism. Ironically, this strategy could backfire as he attempts to consolidate support leading into a rumored presidential campaign.

“I think it’s important for us to engage and debate a range of perspectives, but I question elevating individuals who spread dangerous and divisive rhetoric,” said Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, a fellow Democrat, emphasizing the potential pitfalls of Newsom’s approach.

During a recent interview on his podcast, Newsom offered a platform to Bannon, who has a controversial reputation following his imprisonment for defying a subpoena related to the January 6 Capitol riot investigation. Critics argue that such interviews legitimize extremist views and the spread of misinformation.

Prominent Democratic Congress members have expressed concern that by hosting right-wing guests, Newsom may inadvertently validate their fringe narratives. “His fringe views were elevated and validated,” stated a Democratic legislator who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Conversely, some of Newsom’s guests have painted a surprisingly favorable portrait of his ambition. Kirk, a pro-Trump podcaster, described Newsom as “savvy and charming” and suggested the governor is keen on securing the presidency, asserting he possesses “shark’s instincts” in politics.

Former Congressman Adam Kinzinger criticized Newsom’s strategy, noting that many on the right have sacrificed careers to oppose figures like Bannon. “Newsom is trying to build his career at an enormous cost to our democracy,” Kinzinger remarked, highlighting the ethical implications of Newsom’s guest selections.

Despite the backlash, some political experts argue that Newsom’s aim to forge connections across the aisle is well-intentioned amidst an increasingly polarized political landscape. “We need to find common ground without normalizing conspiracy theories or hatred,” said a political analyst who preferred anonymity.

It remains to be seen whether Newsom’s current tactics will prove effective as he prepares for an anticipated presidential bid. As he attempts to redefine his political identity, the implications of his podcast choices could have lasting effects on both his gubernatorial role and future political endeavors.