Demi Moore’s Oscar Chances Spark Controversy Amid Criticism of Performance

LOS ANGELES, CA — Demi Moore‘s performance in the body-horror film The Substance has sparked debate following her Golden Globe win for Best Actress. In her acceptance speech on January 5, Moore reflected on past criticism she faced in Hollywood, stating she was labeled a ‘popcorn actress’ and felt unworthy of accolades despite her success.

Despite mixed reviews for the film, betting markets favor Moore as a potential winner for the upcoming Oscars, leading many to proclaim her the front-runner. The betting platform Polymarket lists her odds of winning higher than other contenders. Media outlets, including Vulture and the New York Times, have highlighted her performance, suggesting it has advantages over other nominees.

However, critics argue Moore’s performance does not merit an Oscar. Early screenings of The Substance often left viewers overwhelmed by its graphic imagery and convoluted plot, overshadowing Moore’s acting. Slate‘s Dana Stevens commented that the film is “a mess, full of sound and fury” with Moore primarily reacting to horror rather than showcasing a significant range of emotion.

Moore delivers one compelling scene, where she struggles with self-acceptance as she prepares for a date with a former classmate. Critics noted this moment could serve as an impactful Oscar reel. Yet, many believe that her performance lacks depth, suggesting it could have been less impactful if another actress had taken the role.

Margaret Qualley, who portrays a younger version of Moore’s character, was overlooked for an Oscar nomination, despite showcasing remarkable talent in her own right. Some assert that Qualley’s performance may have been equally deserving of recognition, sparking further complications in the Oscars narrative.

Others in this year’s awards conversation, like Nicole Kidman in Babygirl, have offered profound exploratory performances of women grappling with aging. Critics assert that Kidman’s nuanced portrayal carries more emotional gravity than Moore’s. Kidman’s character in Babygirl illustrates a complex journey of self-discovery that resonates more deeply with audiences.

Notably, Moore’s visual transformation, achieved through extensive makeup, serves the film’s aesthetic but obscures her acting subtleties. The contrast between her face and hands highlights the aggressive portrayal the film enacts on aging female bodies, yet less acts as a strength of her performance and more as a visual distraction.

Additionally, the discourse surrounding Moore’s narrative of redemption complicates her standing as a Best Actress nominee. Given her storied past in Hollywood and a tumultuous relationship with fame, an Academy win would symbolize a significant personal achievement. Conversely, the notion of deservingness raises eyebrows when compared to other nominees who have navigated similar but distinct narratives.

As the Academy Awards approach, many are speculating whether the Academy, attempting to be more politically savvy and inclusive, will award Moore to reflect progress. However, critics assert that an Oscar should reward performance merit rather than personal storytelling.

Despite the strong narrative surrounding her, many hope the Academy’s focus remains on performance intricacy and not solely on story arc, with several competitors raising equally compelling stories. Critics will continue to assess whether Hollywood’s spotlight on Moore is justified or if it obscures others more deserving of winning the prestigious accolade.