Connect with us

Sports

Post-UFC 309 Analysis Sparks Debate on Jon Jones vs. Francis Ngannou

Published

on

Jon Jones Ufc 309

After UFC 309, discussions have emerged questioning the potential performance of Francis Ngannou against Jon Jones. Jon Jones retained his UFC heavyweight title in a dominant display at Madison Square Garden in New York, where he defeated Stipe Miocic (20-5 MMA, 14-5 UFC) using a spinning back kick to the body.

Commenting on the potential matchup, Chael Sonnen expressed doubts about Ngannou’s chances against Jones. «Do you know what Jon would have done to Francis Ngannou in hindsight?» Sonnen queried on a podcast with Daniel Cormier. «Now that we look back, Jon would have picked that big man a part. I mean, I’m just sharing with you, like, that’s a big man’s nightmare. Jon’s not a heavyweight; Jon is fighting at heavyweight. There’s a massive difference.»

Jones and Ngannou were initially on a trajectory to face each other before Ngannou decided to sign with PFL, altering his career path. Daniel Cormier, who has previously faced Jones twice, remarked on Jones’s ability in the wrestling arena. «Yes, dude, Francis would have struggled with Jones,» Cormier stated. «Dude, he threw Stipe down and just beat the crap out of him. He literally grabbed him by the neck, stepped behind his leg, and threw him down. He choke-slammed him and just beat him on the ground.»

This analysis comes amid a broader conversation about Jones’ versatility and strategy in the heavyweight division, particularly highlighting his wrestling capabilities and strategic fighting style.

Fans and analysts continue to debate the hypothetical clash, with varying opinions on how Ngannou’s striking power would have fared against Jones’ tactical approach and skill set.

Rachel Adams

Times News Global is a dynamic online news portal dedicated to providing comprehensive and up-to-date news coverage across various domains including politics, business, entertainment, sports, security, features, opinions, environment, education, technology and global. affairs. Our commitment lies in sharing news that is based on factual accuracy, credibility, verifiability, authority and depth of research. We pride ourselves on being a distinctive media organization, guided by the principles enshrined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Made up of a team of ordinary people driven by an unwavering dedication to uncovering the truth, we publish news without bias or intimidation.

Entradas recientes