Judge Dismisses Drake’s Defamation Lawsuit Against Universal Music Group

NEW YORK, NY — A federal judge dismissed Drake‘s defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) on Thursday, ruling that Kendrick Lamar’s song “Not Like Us” contains lyrics that are a matter of opinion rather than factual statements. The lawsuit claimed that the song, which labels Drake as a ‘certified pedophile,’ harmed his reputation.

Judge Jeannette Vargas ruled that during a heated rap battle, such language is often seen as hyperbolic and not meant to be taken literally. ‘The artists’ seven-track rap battle was a ‘war of words’ that was the subject of substantial media scrutiny,’ she said. ‘Listeners would not believe that the song imparts verifiable facts about plaintiff.’

Drake’s legal team believed the lyrics were damaging enough to warrant a case, indicating millions interpreted them as truth. UMG’s spokesperson welcomed the ruling, saying the lawsuit was an ‘affront to all artists and their creative expression.’

The dispute began when Kendrick released “Not Like Us” in May, sparking a series of diss tracks against Drake. UMG’s defense included the assertion that hyperbolic insults are common in rapper feuds and cannot serve as a basis for defamation.

Judge Vargas noted Drake himself employed similar incendiary language in his own tracks, referencing lines from his song ‘Family Matters’ which implied accusations against Lamar. She stated that diss tracks do not convey sober facts and this case was a notable example of the context surrounding artistic expression.

The judge ultimately ruled against Drake, emphasizing that the popularity of ‘Not Like Us’ after its release could not influence the song’s original intent. While Drake’s attorneys may appeal the decision, UMG has expressed satisfaction with the court’s dismissal, reinforcing their commitment to supporting Drake’s career.