U.S. Government Steps In to Defend Rep. Nancy Mace in Lawsuit

WASHINGTON – U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, R-Charleston, is seeking protection from a defamation lawsuit, according to South Carolina’s top federal attorney. U.S. Attorney Bryan Stirling argued in a July 11 court filing that Mace’s statements about a Fort Mill man being a sexual predator were part of her official duties as an elected official.

Stirling’s filing indicates that Mace’s role in making public accusations of rape and sexual assault should shield her from liability in the lawsuit filed by Brian Musgrave. The federal government has requested to take Mace’s place as the defendant, asserting that if they succeed, the case should be dismissed.

U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel will decide whether the government can replace Mace, a determination that may have broader implications for how politicians are held accountable for their public statements. Mace’s office declined to comment but referred inquiries to House general counsel Matthew Berry.

Mace has claimed she is both a victim and witness against Musgrave and three other men she accused of sexual misconduct. All accused individuals have denied the charges, which Mace made during a speech on the House floor and on social media.

Musgrave’s lawsuit, filed in March, argues that Mace defamed and libeled him preemptively before stepping onto the House floor. His complaint claims that Mace’s accusations, supported by a poster tagging him as a predator, harmed both him and his family.

Musgrave’s attorney, Eric Bland, criticized the government’s legal stance, arguing that it raises crucial concerns about politicians’ power. He emphasized that if politicians misuse their platforms, they could significantly impact the lives of ordinary citizens.

Bland highlighted potential motives behind Mace’s accusations, suggesting they may be linked to her personal ties and political ambitions. He reiterated that her behavior should not be considered official conduct when it appears motivated by personal reasons.

The government’s filings contend that even with additional motivations, Mace’s actions fall within her official duties. A hearing to address this matter is expected to be scheduled soon.