JJ Redick Critiques NBA’s Most Improved Player Award

Los Angeles, CA — As the NBA awards season approaches, JJ Redick voiced his strong criticism of the Most Improved Player (MIP) award, questioning its criteria and relevance. Following a practice session with the Los Angeles Lakers on April 3, Redick expressed his frustrations to the media, making it clear he believes the award has lost its way.

“I hate that award because they fail to define it,” Redick stated. “And I think the spirit of it has been taken out of whack. Just call it the high draft pick that is on a max contract and now is an All-Star. That’s what it’s become. I don’t think that’s the spirit of the award.”

Redick’s remarks come at a time when discussions about award nominations are intensifying, particularly surrounding this year’s MIP contenders. He pointed out that many recent winners, with the exception of Tyrese Maxey in 2024, were all selected in the top seven of their respective drafts and have made at least one All-Star appearance.

The list of the last five MIP winners read as follows: Tyrese Maxey (2024), Lauri Markkanen (2023), Ja Morant (2022), Julius Randle (2021), and Brandon Ingram (2020). This trend raises questions regarding the award’s intention of recognizing genuine improvement versus expected progression based on draft status.

Redick indicated that winning the MIP award should pertain to players who surpass expectations and achieve extraordinary growth, rather than those who simply meet pre-established aspirations. He contended that the award should honor unexpected successes rather than players who fulfill their anticipated potential as high draft picks.

Cade Cunningham, who was selected first overall in 2021 and was recently named an All-Star, is currently in the conversation for this year’s MIP. However, Redick and analysts alike argue whether Cunningham’s achievements qualify as true improvement.

“Sure, he has improved statistically, but isn’t that expected when you’re the top pick on a max deal?” Redick asked, dismissing the notion that Cunningham’s performance should be considered groundbreaking.

While discussing the inconsistency of award voting—a sentiment echoed by various NBA analysts—Redick noted that players like Austin Reaves of the Lakers might better embody the purpose of the MIP award, given Reaves’ rise as an undrafted player contributing significantly to a championship-contending team.

The disparity between those like Cunningham and Reaves has sparked broader discussions about the award’s future. As Redick stated, “If the award is called the ‘Most Improved Player,’ shouldn’t it focus on players who improved in ways that weren’t expected?”

Redick’s insight reflects a growing debate within the NBA community regarding the criteria for the MIP award, highlighting a need for clarity and consistency. As award season nears, the Lakers’ coach remains focused on ensuring his team performs well, even as he fiercely critiques the NBA’s evaluation metrics.