Trump Nominates Olivia Trusty to FCC, Shifting Agency Balance

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Former President Donald Trump announced Thursday his nomination of Olivia Trusty, a policy director for Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS), to fill the fifth seat on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The move aims to solidify Republican control over the agency, which regulates telecommunications and media industries.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump praised Trusty, stating, “Olivia will work with our incredible new Chairman of the FCC, Brendan Carr, to cut regulations at a record pace, protect Free Speech, and ensure every American has access to affordable and fast Internet.” Trusty, a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Georgetown University, currently serves as policy director on the Senate Commerce Committee.

The nomination comes as current FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel, appointed by President Joe Biden, prepares to step down on Monday, coinciding with Trump’s return to office. Rosenworcel’s departure will leave the FCC with a 2-2 partisan split until the Senate confirms Trusty’s appointment.

Brendan Carr, a current FCC commissioner, has already been appointed by Trump to serve as the agency’s chairman. Carr, a Republican, has been a vocal advocate for deregulation and expanding broadband access in rural areas. His leadership, combined with Trusty’s potential confirmation, could accelerate efforts to roll back regulations enacted during the Biden administration.

The FCC plays a critical role in shaping policies related to internet access, media ownership, and telecommunications infrastructure. Trusty’s nomination underscores Trump’s commitment to advancing conservative priorities within the agency, including reducing regulatory burdens and promoting free speech protections.

Senate confirmation hearings for Trusty are expected to begin in the coming weeks. If confirmed, she would join Carr and two Democratic commissioners, creating a 3-2 Republican majority. The shift in balance could have significant implications for the future of U.S. telecommunications policy.