Critics Weigh In on Kathryn Bigelow’s A House of Dynamite

London, England — Last weekend, director Kathryn Bigelow‘s latest film, A House of Dynamite, made waves as it premiered both in theaters and on Netflix. The film, which explores the anxieties surrounding a potential nuclear missile launch, showcases Bigelow’s masterful storytelling, reminiscent of her earlier works.

A House of Dynamite presents a gripping narrative that delves into the 18 minutes following the detection of an incoming missile aimed at the United States. According to critics, the film is intensely suspenseful, combining elements of drama and political thriller. Idris Elba stars as the U.S. president, leading an impressive ensemble cast through the film’s harrowing plot.

Reviews of the film have been mixed, with some outlets praising its tension and direction. Empire described the film as ‘brilliantly entertaining.’ However, it currently holds an 80% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, suggesting a divide in audience reception. Critics highlight the film’s unique approach of presenting the narrative through multiple vantage points, creating an immersive viewing experience.

Not all feedback has been positive, though, especially from the Pentagon. According to an internal memorandum obtained by Bloomberg, the Missile Defense Agency expressed dissatisfaction with the portrayal of the U.S. missile defense system in the film. They noted that Bigelow’s fictional depiction might mislead viewers regarding the actual capabilities of the defense systems, emphasizing a 100% success rate in recent tests while the film suggests otherwise.

Bigelow, who previously won an Oscar for The Hurt Locker, is known for tackling complex and charged topics in her films. In response to the Pentagon’s concerns, she stated she aimed for a more independent vision, although she did consult various technical advisors during production.

With its recent Netflix release on October 24, A House of Dynamite invites audiences to engage with its thought-provoking themes. Whether positively or negatively received, the film presents significant questions about the realities of nuclear threats and the precariousness of global security.