Liberal Party’s Climate Policy Reversal Sparks Outrage and Support

Canberra, Australia – The Liberal Party’s abrupt decision to abandon its commitment to a net zero emissions target has triggered intense criticism from climate advocacy groups and concern among moderate party members about its electoral impact.

Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull condemned the move, stating that it demonstrates the party’s lack of seriousness about climate change. In comments to Guardian Australia, he accused the opposition of engaging in a ‘Trumpian campaign against renewables.’ Turnbull’s remarks reflect the growing divide within the party, particularly between its moderate and right-wing factions.

While moderates express alarm over the potential fallout in urban electorates, conservative lawmakers and advocates have hailed the decision. The right-wing group Advance called the shift a ‘major victory’ in its campaign against climate activists.

Nationals leader David Littleproud voiced optimism about reaching a unified stance with Liberal MPs, emphasizing the necessity of addressing climate change. He said, ‘We believe that we need to do something about it. That we should do our fair share.’

However, environmental organizations have labeled the decision a ‘disaster.’ The Australian Conservation Foundation accused the Liberals of abandoning climate action and yielding to fossil fuel interests, potentially leading to severe weather consequences for Australians.

Despite claims from Liberal leaders that they remain committed to the Paris Agreement, critics have pointed out that distancing from net zero targets is likely to exacerbate global temperature increases. Sarah Hanson-Young, a senator from the Greens, described the announcement as ‘a train wreck,’ while independent MP Zali Steggall criticized it as ‘reckless.’

Moderate MPs have expressed concern about selling the new policy, with some acknowledging that it may alienate voters in urban areas. Former Liberal MP Jason Falinski questioned the electoral benefits of the decision, asking, ‘I look forward to understanding how this wins us more votes.’

Charlotte Mortlock, founder of Hilma’s Network, asserted that the reversal would hinder the party’s chances of regaining support in inner metropolitan seats. ‘What I fear is the main takeaway is we are not taking climate change seriously,’ she said.

Energy and climate change expert Tony Wood from the Grattan Institute warned that the lack of a definitive climate policy direction could undermine investor confidence, stating that the proposed changes are insufficient to reduce emissions and prices.

The internal struggle within the Liberal Party showcases growing tensions over climate policy. With moderate figures opposing the decision, the party faces a challenging path ahead.