Analysis Reveals Limitations of Apple’s 11th-Generation iPad

NEW YORK, March 26, 2025 — Apple‘s recent release of its 11th-generation iPad has drawn mixed reactions among tech enthusiasts and consumers. The base model, priced at $349, raises questions about its longevity and performance compared to higher-end models in the lineup.

As part of the evaluation, benchmark testing using Geekbench reveals concerning trends regarding the new device. Though the 11th-generation iPad offers competent performance for everyday tasks like video streaming and web browsing, it significantly lags behind its more powerful counterparts, namely the M3 Air and previous M2 Air models.

Despite similar single-core performance, the new iPad falls short in multi-core testing. The M3 Air scored more than double that of the base iPad in multi-core capabilities, while the M2 Air outperformed the new device by 60 percent. This suggests that while the iPad remains suitable for casual use, it is not equipped to handle demanding applications or multitasking scenarios.

“The base iPad is still a lovely, fast, usable device for casual use. It’s an excellent Netflix machine,” said David Pierce, editor-at-large at The Verge, emphasizing the tablet’s strengths in basic activities. However, he cautions that graphics performance quickly deteriorates under heavy loads, citing specific games that do not support the device.

Limitations extend beyond gaming. The base iPad lacks support for Apple’s latest features, such as Apple Intelligence, which could hinder its usefulness as software evolves. At present, it comes with 6GB of RAM, while the M3 Air models offer 8GB.

Another drawback is compatibility with accessories. Apple’s latest Pencil and Magic Keyboard do not support the current iPad, instead only allowing use of the previous-generation Pencil and a less effective keyboard option, contributing to a less robust user experience.

Pierce notes, “If you want the latest technology, you’ll have to pay more.” This strategy highlights Apple’s goal of steering consumers to purchase its more premium offerings, as the base iPad’s market share continues to grow—a trend that Apple may find unsustainable for its profit margins.

As the entry-level iPad struggles to keep pace with user expectations and the shadow of rapidly advancing technology, potential buyers might find better long-term value in the higher-priced Air or Pro models. Apple’s design and technology shifts suggest that its entry-level iPad may not be the optimal choice for consumers looking to future-proof their investment.

Despite its practicality, the base iPad exhibits indications of reaching its limits, making it a less attractive option for those seeking longevity and capacity for growth. As Apple continues to innovate, the gap between entry-level and premium models could widen, prompting buyers to reconsider their options.