Benny Gantz Resigns from Israeli War Cabinet: Potential Impact on Gaza Conflict

Former general and leader of Israel‘s National Unity party, Benny Gantz, has officially resigned from the Israeli war cabinet, citing a lack of agreement on a comprehensive plan for the Gaza conflict beyond the current military operations.

In mid-May, Gantz presented a detailed six-point proposal for the administration of Gaza post-conflict. He had warned that if this plan was not accepted, he would step down from his position in the cabinet.

Gantz’s proposed plan included the implementation of a temporary civil administration system for Gaza involving the US, Europe, Arab nations, and Palestinian authorities, while maintaining Israeli security control overall.

There is a growing consensus among both local and international stakeholders that Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu rejected Gantz’s plan for personal political motives.

The resignation statement from Gantz highlighted his frustration with Netanyahu’s hindrance to progress, stating, “Netanyahu is preventing us from advancing toward true victory.”

US President Joe Biden has expressed concerns over Netanyahu’s motivations, suggesting that the prolonged conflict in Gaza could be serving the prime minister’s political survival amidst legal challenges.

Gantz’s exit from the war cabinet potentially opens the door for more hardline politicians aligned with Netanyahu’s policies to gain influence, with figures like National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir expressing interest in the vacant seat.

Ben-Gvir, along with other right-wing figures in Netanyahu’s coalition, hold views on Gaza that involve encouraging voluntary relocation of its inhabitants and Israeli settlement expansion.

Despite Gantz’s resignation, the trajectory of the Gaza conflict remains uncertain, with public opinion in Israel divided on the military approach, while Netanyahu aims to cripple Hamas through military means.

The political landscape in Israel may experience shifts as a result of Gantz’s departure, potentially leading to a reevaluation of the country’s strategy in Gaza and broader regional policies.