Leading Paediatrician Warns Government on Risks of Banning Conversion Practices

Leading paediatrician Dr. Hilary Cass, who spearheaded the review of gender identity services for individuals under 18, has cautioned the government on the potential risks associated with a planned ban on conversion practices. In her discussions with the Minister for Women and Equalities, Kemi Badenoch, Dr. Cass emphasized the importance of ensuring that any new legislation does not inadvertently create challenges for healthcare professionals.

The proposed legislation, aimed at prohibiting conversion practices that seek to alter an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity, has faced delays amidst disagreements within the Conservative Party. Reports suggest that the introduction of a draft bill may now extend beyond the upcoming general election.

Kemi Badenoch has advocated for taking decisive action to prevent the harm caused by attempting to ‘cure’ LGBTQ+ individuals of their inherent identities, emphasizing the significance of safeguarding teachers, doctors, and parents from potential legal implications.

Dr. Cass’s recently issued review highlighted concerns raised by medical professionals regarding the ambiguous interpretation of conversion practices legislation, with fears surrounding accusations of transphobia impacting professional conduct. The review underscored the necessity for careful wording in any prospective law to mitigate such anxieties among practitioners.

Addressing the sensitive nature of the issue, Rishi Sunak, a prominent political figure, acknowledged the need for caution when navigating discussions around gender identity and conversion practices. He stressed the imperative of approaching these matters with compassion while also exercising prudence due to the uncertain long-term impacts of interventions.

A government source reiterated the importance of thorough deliberation to ensure the legislation effectively addresses harmful practices without unintended consequences, emphasizing the vital role of open dialogue and informed decision-making in this contentious domain.