Connect with us

Business

States Sue Trump Administration Over SNAP Funding Cuts Amid Shutdown Crisis

Published

on

Trump Administration Snap Funding Lawsuit

LOS ANGELES, CA — A coalition of 25 states and the District of Columbia have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for its decision to halt federal funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), affecting over 40 million low-income Americans. The lawsuit was announced as the U.S. government entered its 28th day of shutdown Tuesday, leaving many families facing food insecurity.

The states, led by Democratic attorneys general, are seeking to compel the administration to utilize a $6 billion emergency contingency fund meant for SNAP. Currently, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has stated it will not use these funds and that benefits may expire on November 1. The USDA argues that these funds might be necessary for unforeseen emergencies in the future.

California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the move, saying it reflects a lack of compassion from Trump. “It’s cruel and speaks to his basic lack of humanity. He doesn’t care about the people of this country, only himself,” Newsom said.

The lawsuit claims that depriving families of SNAP benefits would be unlawful and could harm public health. It cites concerns about increases in hunger and malnutrition. “Shutting off SNAP benefits will cause deterioration of public health and well-being,” the lawsuit states. The program works by providing families with reloadable debit cards for purchasing essential groceries, with an average monthly benefit of $715 for a family of four.

Despite the administration’s refusal to release the contingency funds, some states have plans to cover shortfalls with their own budgets. However, many state officials warn that they do not have sufficient resources to fully compensate for the lack of federal funding. Massachusetts officials remarked that one million residents may lose their benefits due to the ongoing shutdown.

The USDA claims the fund cannot be utilized without appropriations for regular monthly benefits being in place. Critics, including Rep. Rosa DeLauro from Connecticut, express frustration, stating that the administration is “playing fast and loose” with essential food aid. “Can you imagine that? The money is there!” DeLauro exclaimed.

A hearing for the lawsuit is scheduled for Thursday. As the deadline approaches, states scramble to find alternative food sources, and local food banks prepare for a potential surge in demand as beneficiaries are left without aid.

The government shutdown continues without a clear resolution in sight, leaving millions uncertain about their food assistance at a crucial time.