DNI Tulsi Gabbard Fires Top National Intelligence Council Officials

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), has terminated the leadership of the National Intelligence Council (NIC) amid ongoing efforts to address intelligence leaks. Gabbard dismissed Mike Collins, the acting chair, and his deputy, Maria Langan-Riekhof, on Tuesday, citing concerns over politicization within the intelligence community.

According to senior intelligence officials, both Collins and Langan-Riekhof had been labeled as being “radically opposed to Trump.” This dismissal follows allegations that Collins had attempted to undermine the former Trump administration and had been linked to past whistleblower complaints. He also faced scrutiny over his association with Michael Morrell, a former deputy director who publicly questioned the credibility of a narrative regarding Hunter Biden’s laptop.

In her statement, Gabbard emphasized the need for accountability within the ODNI, stating, “It is vital that any improper action and politicization of intelligence be directly addressed.” She has initiated a thorough investigation to root out “deep state” leakers from the intelligence community.

Officials revealed that current investigations involve twelve other intelligence professionals suspected of leaking classified information to major publications like The Washington Post and The New York Times. Gabbard has already referred three cases for potential criminal prosecution this past April.

A senior official noted that the National Intelligence Council has always been a part of the DNI framework, suggesting the structural shift would boost oversight. Gabbard commented previously that “leaking classified information puts our nation’s security at risk and must end.”

As part of her accountability measures, Gabbard has also established a task force aimed at restoring integrity and transparency within the intelligence community. It has begun investigating unauthorized disclosures and will focus on ensuring that declassification aligns with public interest.

Despite the ongoing changes, Gabbard faces backlash over the political implications of her actions, highlighting a divided sentiment in the intelligence community. Critics warn that her approach may force analysts to align their findings with the administration’s agenda or risk dismissal.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is currently without several key nominees, further complicating the situation as Gabbard works to navigate these significant transitions.