The Impact of MrBeast’s Charity Videos on Young Viewers

James Stephen Donaldson, better known as MrBeast, has become one of the most influential YouTubers in the world with a massive following of 234 million subscribers. His channel is known for its philanthropic content, where he gives away large sums of money to those he deems deserving. While many praise MrBeast for his generosity, there are concerns about the impact his videos have on young viewers.

Parents often find relief in their kids watching MrBeast’s channel, as he rarely swears and delivers entertaining content. However, it is important to recognize that the act of giving away money for views and clicks can create a simplistic understanding of the world’s problems among his young audience. One parent, Julie Cook, shares her concerns and highlights that cash cannot fix all issues.

While MrBeast’s charity videos focus on individuals in need, it is essential to remember that only a small minority receives his help. This raises questions about what happens to the millions of others who require assistance. The danger lies in young people perceiving money as a quick-fix solution to all problems, which is not the case in reality.

In addition to this concern, there is a perceived self-centeredness in MrBeast’s videos. Filming himself giving to those less fortunate can be seen as narcissistic, leading to questions about his true motivations. The rise of similar content creators, both on TikTok and Instagram, further supports the appeal of this type of video style, where individuals are filmed giving money or assistance to those in need.

This portrayal of the less fortunate being helped by the more fortunate is troubling, as it simplifies and stereotypes people’s situations. When MrBeast built 100 wells in Africa, criticisms arose suggesting he was perpetuating the white savior narrative. These criticisms question the need for publicizing acts of philanthropy and whether it truly aligns with the intentions behind them.

Julie Cook believes that such content preys on the innocence of young people, who yearn to believe in a kind and generous world. These videos present an idealized version of reality where kind-hearted individuals are always ready to donate money, pay bills, and offer shelter to strangers. However, as Cook points out, this is not always the case.

While philanthropy is undoubtedly a positive force, the simplistic nature of these videos aimed at children does not accurately represent the complexity of the real world. Homelessness will not be eradicated because MrBeast provides money to a few individuals, and the lives of impoverished single mothers will not miraculously improve. Ultimately, these videos seem to prioritize the performance of philanthropy over its true impact.