World
Qatar’s Diplomacy Shines Amid Ongoing Israel-Hamas Conflict

DOHA, Qatar — Qatar is enhancing its role in international diplomacy, particularly in the context of the ongoing Israel–Hamas conflict. On March 3, 2025, Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Minister HE Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani met with Thai Foreign Minister HE Maris Sangiampongsa to discuss strengthening bilateral ties and address international issues.
The discussions centered on improving cooperation in key sectors such as trade, tourism, and health. Sangiampongsa expressed thanks for Qatar’s involvement in securing the release of Thai hostages held by Hamas during the ongoing Gaza conflict. “Thailand is appreciative of Qatar’s significant role in this sensitive matter,” he noted during the meeting.
Qatar has expanded its diplomatic presence in recent months, particularly through its mediation efforts between Israel and Hamas, especially following a ceasefire established on January 19, 2025. Majed al-Ansari, Qatar’s foreign affairs spokesman, highlighted the need for continued negotiations around hostages and other critical issues. “Right now, there are a lot of ideas being thrown around to maintain the ceasefire,” Ansari said, stressing the importance of adhering to the frameworks established during the conflict.
He warned against any proposals from the Israel and U.S. administrations that might undermine these frameworks, indicating that phase two negotiations have yet to commence. “The only way to get the hostages home, the only way to get peace in Gaza, is through negotiations for phase two,” Ansari remarked, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts amidst increasing tensions.
Currently, the lack of progress in phase two negotiations has led to frustration, particularly as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hesitates to move forward without disarming Hamas, a request criticized as unrealistic by various stakeholders. These dynamics further complicate the situation, especially given that phase one negotiations had been successfully executed but now seem stalled.
Al Thani’s meeting with Sangiampongsa showcases Qatar’s diplomatic dexterity and its efforts to maintain influence beyond the region. Al-Ansari affirmed Qatar’s dedication to facilitating humanitarian aid appropriately while maintaining dialogues. “Using humanitarian aid as bargaining chips violates international human rights,” he asserted. Such statements highlight Qatar’s stance on humanitarian principles amid the ongoing hostilities.
Amidst this backdrop, Hamas has consistently expressed its intention to engage solely within the established negotiation framework while accusing Israel of failing to follow through on pivotal points. This tension is particularly acute as the ceasefire agreement approaches expiration. Despite setbacks, Ansari reiterated that discussions between the involved parties continue, positioning Qatar prominently as a mediator in these turbulent waters.
Compounding these challenges are disputes regarding humanitarian aid cessation from Israel to Gaza following the conclusion of phase one negotiations. Additionally, inter-Arab dynamics complicate the postwar management of Gaza, with many Arab nations in favor of restoring stability yet hesitant about Hamas’s future governance role.
While some Arab officials advocate for Hamas’s incremental weakening, Qatar’s diplomatic approach includes ensuring Hamas’s involvement for Palestinian autonomy. Ansari reaffirmed Qatar’s dedication to the Palestinian Authority as the legitimate representative of Palestinian interests, stating, “We’ve always said the PA is the legitimate representative. We are also one of the last stable supporters of the PA in the region.”
Looking ahead, regional leaders, including representatives from Qatar, are expected to convene soon to finalize plans for Gaza’s postwar governance. The urgency for prioritizing negotiations over escalating conflict is paramount, as the interconnected fates of militant factions and peace processes remain fragile.
Qatar’s ongoing diplomatic efforts with Thailand and its mediation role underscore its strategic significance on the global stage. As the situation evolves, it remains to be seen how these multifaceted negotiations will unfold, with Qatar aiming to assert itself as both a fundamental mediator and strong advocate within the complex geopolitical landscape of the Middle East. Ansari addressed recent allegations regarding Qatar’s relationship with Hamas, stating, “Our engagement with Hamas was mainly through the reconstruction committee—and anything beyond is fake news aimed at harming Qatar’s reputation.” With ongoing developments in the Israel-Hamas conflict, Qatar’s ability to navigate these issues effectively may be crucial for regional stability.