Shakira Takes Legal Action Against Influencer Over Son’s Criticism

Miami, FL — Colombian singer Shakira is reportedly taking a strong stand for her family by filing a legal complaint against influencer Luis Castillejo, known as El Temach, after he made a series of comments about her youngest son, Sasha.

The comments, which went viral on social media, have been widely criticized as misogynistic and homophobic, sparking significant public backlash. Shakira’s legal action appears to reflect her concern for her son’s emotional well-being and her opposition to the rising tide of offensive content that adversely affects the dignity of individuals, particularly children, who do not choose public exposure.

El Temach initially ignited controversy by posting a video in which he criticized Sasha’s body language, labeling it as “effeminate.” He suggested that Sasha’s behavior was connected to the lack of a father figure and attributed it to the child not participating in activities deemed “masculine.” This commentary drew immediate outrage from social media users, who accused El Temach of perpetuating gender stereotypes and unjustifiably attacking a minor.

However, no official sources or Shakira’s legal representatives have confirmed the existence of this lawsuit. The only person who has mentioned it is El Temach himself, who claimed it in one of his videos without providing any documentary proof. As of now, no public evidence confirms that Shakira has initiated legal action.

Following the allegations of a potential legal move, El Temach released another video seeking support from his followers, especially those with legal expertise, to prepare for the judicial process. This decision stirred further controversy, with many believing he is attempting to exploit the situation and portray himself as a victim rather than taking responsibility for his remarks.

Social media reactions quickly turned in favor of Shakira, with numerous users expressing support for her decision to take legal action, emphasizing that attacks on children should not be tolerated. El Temach, who has faced criticism in other contexts, has now found himself at the center of a broader discussion regarding the limits of public discourse and the ramifications of irresponsible use of social media.

Many voices from the artistic, journalistic, and legal communities have joined the outcry against El Temach’s comments, saying that freedom of expression should not be used as a shield to justify messages that promote hate, discrimination, or the harassment of minors.

Shakira’s legal complaint seeks not only to halt the proliferation of these harmful messages but also to send a clear message about the necessity of respecting children’s privacy, especially concerning public figures. The case highlights a growing concern about how digital rhetoric can become a form of symbolic violence.

This incident underscores that media exposure should not serve as an excuse to violate fundamental rights, particularly when it involves minors. Shakira’s decision could mark a turning point in how public attacks on celebrity children are legally addressed and signals the urgency of establishing ethical boundaries for content in the digital environment.