Trump’s Second Term: Successes and Failures in Power Grab

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In the first 100 days of Donald Trump’s second term, his administration has stirred controversy with a series of sweeping executive actions that critics label as an attack on democratic norms. While Trump touts achievements, significant resistance emerges from various sectors, suggesting deeper flaws in his approach.

From dismantling agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to threatening the independence of key institutions, Trump’s governance style is drawing sharp rebuke. Political scientist Lucan Way notes, “We should thank our lucky stars that Trump chose to do this in the most stupid way possible,” particularly pointing to legal setbacks the administration faced in courts.

Trump’s efforts, such as attempts to end birthright citizenship and clamp down on the media, have met considerable pushback. As courts increasingly rule against his policies, Trump’s once-assured maneuvering appears faltering. Critically, even former allies in elite circles express growing disdain as his popularity wanes, according to recent polling.

Historically, movements toward authoritarianism require stealth and strategy, characterized by leaders like Viktor Orbán in Hungary. Orbán’s quiet dismantling of democracy contrasts sharply with Trump’s overt tactics, leading experts like Jennifer Victor to criticize Trump’s approach as ill-timed and poorly executed. This miscalculation may ultimately undermine his broader objectives to concentrate power.

Key institutions, from the judiciary to higher education, are standing firm against presidential overreach. Lawmakers and civil society hold significant potential to push back against authoritarian tendencies, yet many hesitate to act decisively, leading to concerns about the future of democratic governance in America. As pointed out by several experts, public support is pivotal; without it, Trump’s grasp on power could weaken further.

The unfolding drama in Washington reveals both the dangers and resilience of American democracy. While Trump’s first 100 days offer cause for concern, they also show that institutional checks and public engagement continue to serve as critical bulwarks against potential tyranny.