International Backlash Over Hong Kong National Security Law Intensifies

Following the passing of Hong Kong‘s controversial national security law, international criticism has escalated, with several countries expressing strong opposition to the legislation.

China, the architect of the law, swiftly retaliated against the United Kingdom and the European Union, labeling their critiques as ‘slandering and smearing’.

The law, commonly referred to as Article 23, was approved by Hong Kong lawmakers, prompting concerns about its potential impact on fundamental freedoms within the city.

Key figures such as British Foreign Secretary David Cameron raised alarms over the rapid legislative process, citing fears that the law could further erode the rights and freedoms in Hong Kong established under the Sino-British Joint Declaration.

The European Union also voiced its apprehension, expressing worries about the potential implications of the law on the rights and freedoms of Hong Kong residents. Australia, Japan, the United States, and the United Nations have joined the chorus of critics.

China’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, Lin Jian, denounced these criticisms, emphasizing that Hong Kong’s national security regulations are an internal affair and calling out what it perceives as hypocritical remarks from foreign entities.

With tensions escalating between China and its international counterparts, the future ramifications of the national security law on Hong Kong’s autonomy and global standing remain uncertain.