San Francisco Mayoral Candidate Opposes Expansion of Rent Control

In the midst of a heated mayoral race, San Francisco candidate Daniel Lurie has expressed clear opposition to expanding rent control in the city. Despite the proposal being a significant issue in the upcoming election, Lurie maintains that current policies should remain unchanged. His position was reiterated during an interview on Thursday, signaling his intent to potentially veto any new legislation passed by the Board of Supervisors that seeks to expand rent controls.

“I believe we should continue the rent control policies that are in place now,” stated Lurie. “I believe rent control has had a very positive impact, but expanding it is not something I’m considering at this time.” Lurie’s stance comes as California voters consider Proposition 33, a measure that could restrict cities from expanding rent control. As polls indicate a narrow margin, the proposition has sparked broad debate across the state.

Opposing rent control expansion could be a risky political move in a city where the majority of residents are renters. Nevertheless, Lurie stands firm against broadening these regulations, which he argues might deter the construction of new housing units, thereby exacerbating the housing crisis.

In contrast to Lurie, other prominent candidates in the mayoral race hold differing views. Former Mayor Mark Farrell has expressed outright opposition similar to Lurie, while current Mayor London Breed supports the expansion of rent control. Meanwhile, Aaron Peskin, President of the Board of Supervisors, has actively campaigned to extend rent control protections to include thousands more units, particularly those built between 1979 and 1994. Peskin’s proposal hinges on the passage of Proposition 33, which would affect an additional 16,000 units citywide.

Lurie’s opposition to the proposition is shared by several other District 3 candidates, reflecting broader concerns that the measure could impede new housing developments. A statement from the Lurie campaign, articulated by spokesperson Max Szabo, notes that “as mayor, Daniel will thoughtfully consider the implications of any legislation that crosses his desk.” The campaign is clear in stating that the potential effects of Proposition 33 warrant careful consideration regarding their impact on new housing construction.

The discourse surrounding Proposition 33 has galvanized diverse opinions from candidates and local organizations. Some argue that maintaining rent control is vital for tenant protection and housing stability, while opponents showcase arguments related to housing supply and economic impacts.