New Jersey Judge Lifts Ban on Records in Gaudreau Case Amid Privacy Concerns

A New Jersey judge has lifted a temporary injunction restricting the release of public records connected to the fatal accident involving NHL star Johnny Gaudreau and his brother, Matthew Gaudreau. Both brothers tragically lost their lives after being struck by a vehicle while cycling in New Jersey.

The decision by Superior Court Judge Timothy Chell allows two law enforcement agencies — the New Jersey State Police and Salem County Prosecutor’s Office — to potentially release investigatory documents, 911 calls, and other records. Despite this ruling, agency representatives have signaled reluctance to make full disclosures, citing the need to protect the privacy of crime victims in accordance with New Jersey state law.

Attorney William R. Lane, representing the Gaudreau family, expressed concerns over the release of sensitive materials such as 911 calls and photographs depicting the injuries and emergency responses relating to the Gaudreau brothers. Lane emphasized that the family’s primary goal is to protect their privacy and that of the deceased, stating, “They’re doing it for the deceased, and for the families and their children.”

The State Police and Prosecutor’s Office aim to balance investigative transparency with privacy considerations, affirming that any records released will be vetted to safeguard the family’s interests. Judge Chell’s verbal order to lift the injunction will become official once the formal documentation is filed, which was expected late Wednesday or Thursday.

The tragedy occurred while the Gaudreau brothers were in town for their sister’s wedding, scheduled for the day following the incident. The driver, Sean Higgins, is facing two counts of death by auto, with a court appearance set for October 15, coinciding with a pregame ceremony in honor of Johnny and Matthew Gaudreau.

The Prosecutor’s Office highlighted a broader public interest concern, cautioning against the release of material that could distress victims and witnesses, potentially hindering the judicial process. A filing noted that “privacy rights likely will overcome any public interest in some or all of the recordings” and described a call during the incident as particularly “disturbing.”

In related documents, the office emphasized the sensitivity around identifying witnesses who could be exposed to undue media and public attention, potentially impacting witness testimony and case integrity. Additionally, they stressed the trauma experienced by those who made the emergency calls, advocating for their protection as victims in their own right.