Wife Convicted in Conspiracy Behind Celebrity Stylist’s Murder

LOS ANGELES — A jury on Friday convicted Monica Sementilli of murder and conspiracy in the 2017 stabbing death of her husband, celebrity hairstylist Fabio Sementilli, at their Woodland Hills home. Prosecutors argued that Sementilli orchestrated the killing to gain financial benefits and continue her affair with Robert Baker, who has since pleaded no contest to first-degree murder.

The verdict was reached after jurors deliberated for just over eight hours following four days of closing arguments in a case that has captivated the public. Prosecutors presented evidence that portrayed Sementilli as the mastermind behind her husband’s death, intending to collect $1.6 million in life insurance while starting a new life with Baker.

Fabio Sementilli, a prominent hairdresser known for his work with celebrities, was found brutally stabbed in the backyard of their family home just days before his 20th wedding anniversary. Deputy District Attorney Beth Silverman described the case as one highlighting betrayal, greed, and murder for personal gain. ”This is a case about betrayal,” Silverman stated, emphasizing the actions taken by Sementilli to eliminate her husband.

According to court testimony, Monica Sementilli worked with Baker and accomplice Christopher Austin to carry out the murder. Witnesses testified that Austin maintained during his testimony that Monica wanted Fabio Sementilli dead, though he never spoke directly with her about the plot. Baker, however, insisted that he acted independently, claiming, ”I murdered him because I wanted her.”

During the trial, text messages revealed a troubling timeline and considerable planning. Silverman cited instances where Monica deleted encrypted messages with Baker on the day of the murder, suggesting an intent to conceal evidence of premeditation. Prosecutors also highlighted how Monica sent Baker explicit messages even during her husband’s funeral, reinforcing the claim of her ongoing relationship with him.

Defense attorney Leonard Levine argued that Monica’s only wrongdoing was being unfaithful, insisting that she had no part in the murder plot. ”For that she is responsible and will live with that for the rest of her life,” Levine said. He characterized her affair as a personal mistake, but not an act of murder.

Furthermore, Levine emphasized that there was no concrete evidence linking his client directly to the murder, noting that Baker’s testimony could not necessarily be taken at face value. Baker had much to gain by deflecting blame, having received a life sentence without parole in exchange for his plea deal. ”She has suffered for her choices…but she’s not guilty of first-degree murder,” Levine concluded.

In light of the jury’s decision, Monica Sementilli faces a potential life sentence without the possibility of parole. The conviction adds to the tragic circumstances of the case, in which a family was profoundly impacted by actions tied to jealousy and financial motive.